What To Know
- The Nissan Rogue is slightly more affordable than the Honda CR-V, with a starting MSRP of around $27,000 compared to the CR-V’s starting MSRP of around $28,000.
- Both the Nissan Rogue and the Honda CR-V are excellent compact SUVs that offer a compelling blend of practicality, comfort, and fuel efficiency.
- While the CR-V edges out the Rogue in terms of power and cargo space, the Rogue offers a more comfortable ride and a lower price.
Choosing the right compact SUV can be a daunting task, especially with so many excellent options on the market. Two popular contenders that often top the list are the Nissan Rogue and the Honda CR-V. Both vehicles offer a blend of practicality, comfort, and fuel efficiency, making them ideal for families and individuals alike. But which one comes out on top? Let’s delve into a detailed comparison to help you make an informed decision.
Performance and Handling
The Nissan Rogue and Honda CR-V both offer capable powertrains that deliver a smooth and responsive driving experience. The Rogue comes standard with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine producing 181 horsepower and 177 lb-ft of torque, while the CR-V boasts a 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine generating 190 horsepower and 179 lb-ft of torque.
While the CR-V’s turbocharged engine offers slightly more power, both SUVs provide adequate acceleration for everyday driving. The Rogue’s naturally aspirated engine delivers a more linear power delivery, while the CR-V’s turbocharged engine provides a bit more punch, especially at higher speeds.
In terms of handling, both vehicles offer a comfortable and predictable ride. The Rogue’s suspension is slightly softer, offering a more comfortable ride over bumps and potholes. The CR-V, on the other hand, has a slightly firmer suspension, which provides better handling in corners.
Interior and Cargo Space
Both the Nissan Rogue and the Honda CR-V offer spacious and comfortable interiors. The Rogue boasts a well-designed cabin with plenty of headroom and legroom for passengers in both rows. The CR-V, however, offers slightly more cargo space, with a maximum cargo capacity of 75.8 cubic feet compared to the Rogue’s 70 cubic feet.
The Rogue’s interior features a user-friendly infotainment system with a touchscreen display and Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility. The CR-V’s infotainment system is also impressive, offering a clean and intuitive interface with a larger touchscreen display.
Safety Features
Both the Nissan Rogue and the Honda CR-V excel in safety, earning top ratings from the IIHS and NHTSA. Both vehicles come standard with a suite of advanced safety features, including automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, and adaptive cruise control.
The Rogue also offers optional features like blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, and a driver attention monitor. The CR-V similarly offers a comprehensive suite of safety features, including a lane keeping assist system and a road departure mitigation system.
Fuel Efficiency
The Nissan Rogue and Honda CR-V are both known for their fuel efficiency. The Rogue achieves an EPA-estimated 27 mpg city, 35 mpg highway, and 30 mpg combined. The CR-V, on the other hand, gets an EPA-estimated 28 mpg city, 34 mpg highway, and 31 mpg combined.
Both SUVs offer impressive fuel economy for their class, making them ideal for daily commutes and long road trips.
Price and Value
The Nissan Rogue is slightly more affordable than the Honda CR-V, with a starting MSRP of around $27,000 compared to the CR-V’s starting MSRP of around $28,000. However, the CR-V offers a slightly higher resale value.
Both vehicles offer good value for their price, offering a balance of features, performance, and fuel efficiency.
Choosing the Right SUV for You
Ultimately, the best choice between the Nissan Rogue and the Honda CR-V depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize cargo space and a slightly more powerful engine, the CR-V might be a better option. However, if you prefer a more comfortable ride and a slightly lower price tag, the Rogue could be the right choice for you.
The Verdict: A Tie?
Both the Nissan Rogue and the Honda CR-V are excellent compact SUVs that offer a compelling blend of practicality, comfort, and fuel efficiency. While the CR-V edges out the Rogue in terms of power and cargo space, the Rogue offers a more comfortable ride and a lower price. Ultimately, the decision comes down to your individual needs and preferences.
Beyond the Comparison: Exploring Other Options
While the Nissan Rogue and Honda CR-V are both excellent choices, other compact SUVs deserve consideration. The Toyota RAV4, Mazda CX-5, and Subaru Forester all offer unique features and strengths that might align better with your specific needs.
Questions You May Have
Q: Which SUV is better for families?
Both the Rogue and CR-V are excellent family-friendly SUVs. The CR-V offers slightly more cargo space, making it a better option for families with a lot of gear. However, the Rogue’s comfortable ride and user-friendly features also make it a great choice for families.
Q: Which SUV is more reliable?
Both the Rogue and CR-V are known for their reliability. However, the CR-V consistently ranks higher in reliability surveys, making it a slightly more dependable option in the long run.
Q: Which SUV has better technology features?
Both SUVs offer impressive technology features. The Rogue’s infotainment system is user-friendly and easy to navigate, while the CR-V’s larger touchscreen display provides a more immersive experience. Ultimately, the choice comes down to personal preference.
Q: Which SUV is better for off-roading?
Neither the Rogue nor the CR-V is designed for serious off-roading. However, both vehicles offer decent ground clearance and all-wheel drive options, making them capable of handling light off-road conditions.
Q: Which SUV is better for fuel efficiency?
The CR-V slightly edges out the Rogue in terms of fuel economy, achieving an EPA-estimated 31 mpg combined compared to the Rogue’s 30 mpg combined. However, both SUVs offer impressive fuel efficiency for their class.
